Next-Generation Sequencing Reveals Novel Genetic Variants (SRY, DMRT1, NR5A1, DHH, DHX37) in Adults With 46,XY DSD.

CONTEXT: The genetic basis of human sex development is slowly being elucidated, and >40 different genetic causes of differences (or disorders) of sex development (DSDs) have now been reported. However, reaching a specific diagnosis using traditional approaches can be difficult, especially in adults where limited biochemical data may be available. OBJECTIVE: We used a targeted next-generation sequencing approach to analyze known and candidate genes for DSDs in individuals with no specific molecular diagnosis. PARTICIPANTS AND DESIGN: We studied 52 adult 46,XY women attending a single-center adult service, who were part of a larger cohort of 400 individuals. Classic conditions such as17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase deficiency type 3, 5α-reductase deficiency type 2, and androgen insensitivity syndrome were excluded. The study cohort had broad working diagnoses of complete gonadal dysgenesis (CGD) (n = 27) and partially virilized 46,XY DSD (pvDSD) (n = 25), a group that included partial gonadal dysgenesis and those with a broad "partial androgen insensitivity syndrome" label. Targeted sequencing of 180 genes was undertaken. RESULTS: Overall, a likely genetic cause was found in 16 of 52 (30.8%) individuals (22.2% CGD, 40.0% pvDSD). Pathogenic variants were found in sex-determining region Y (SRY; n = 3), doublesex and mab-3-related transcription factor 1 (DMRT1; n = 1), NR5A1/steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1) (n = 1), and desert hedgehog (DHH; n = 1) in the CGD group, and in NR5A1 (n = 5), DHH (n = 1), and DEAH-box helicase 37 (DHX37; n = 4) in the pvDSD group. CONCLUSIONS: Reaching a specific diagnosis can have clinical implications and provides insight into the role of these proteins in sex development. Next-generation sequencing approaches are invaluable, especially in adult populations or where diagnostic biochemistry is not possible.

Glycolate oxidase deficiency in a patient with congenital hyperinsulinism and unexplained hyperoxaluria.

BACKGROUND: A baby girl was born at 39 weeks gestation to consanguineous Asian parents. From day 1 of life she had severe hypoglycaemia with an inappropriately elevated insulin concentration consistent with congenital hyperinsulinism (CHI), confirmed by the finding of a homozygous mutation in ABCC8 (encoding the sulfonylurea receptor 1). CASE DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT: Urine organic acid analysis showed an incidentally elevated excretion of glycolate. Whilst this was unlikely to contribute to the hypoglycaemia, hyperglycolic aciduria is a known feature of primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1); therefore oxalate was also measured in urine and found to be elevated. Sequence analysis of the genes involved in PH1 and also the two other known forms of primary hyperoxaluria revealed no pathological variants. PH1 was definitively excluded by enzyme activity analysis on a liver biopsy, which confirmed normal glyoxylate aminotransferase (AGT) activity and positive AGT immunoreactivity. Glycolate oxidase (GO) deficiency was considered, and thus gene sequencing of HAO1, which encodes GO, was performed. A homozygous change (c.493G>T p.(Gly165Cys)) was found in exon 3 of HAO1, predicted to be deleterious to protein function. Further analysis of the liver biopsy demonstrated absent GO enzyme activity, confirming GO deficiency in this case. CONCLUSIONS: The results lead to the conclusion that this baby has two unrelated autosomal recessive conditions, CHI and GO deficiency, and also hyperoxaluria of unknown aetiology. Deficiency of GO is a very rare disorder with only two previously published cases. It is considered to be an essentially benign inborn error of metabolism. The present case is unique in that GO deficiency is associated with persistent hyperoxaluria.

Urine oxalate biological variation in patients with primary hyperoxaluria.

Hyperoxaluria is a well-recognised risk factor for urolithiasis and patients with primary hyperoxaluria (PH) gradually build up calcium oxalate deposits leading to chronic kidney disease. Efforts to improve treatment for PH have focused on reducing urine oxalate excretion and thus decreasing lithogenesis. To determine the efficacy of treatments designed to alter a biochemical parameter it is necessary to know the biological and analytical variation of that parameter. In this study, we estimated the intra-individual biological variation of urine oxalate excretion in patients with PH, and from this determined what would constitute a significant change in the form of a reference change value (RCV). Each patient collected four 24-h urines on consecutive weeks. The intra-individual biological variation of oxalate excretion calculated from these samples ranged from 0 to 36 % with a mean of 14 %. The corresponding RCVs were 4-84 % with a mean of 32 %. This result implies that, on average, a reduction of almost one-third in urine oxalate excretion is required to prove an effect from treatment. The wide range of biological variation between individuals may reflect other, as yet unknown, determinants of oxaluria in PH, as well as inaccuracies in urine collection. The data suggest that it is more appropriate to use individual RCVs established prior to treatment to determine its efficacy: a relatively small fall in urine oxalate excretion may be outside the biological variation of some patients but not of others.

Simultaneous analysis of urinary metabolites for preliminary identification of primary hyperoxaluria.

BACKGROUND: The primary hyperoxalurias are inherited disorders of glyoxylate metabolism, which cause over-production of oxalate leading to urolithiasis and subsequent renal failure. Other metabolites may be produced in excess in the different forms of PH: glycolate in PH1, glycerate in PH2 and 4-hydroxy-2-oxoglutarate and 2,4-dihydroxyglutarate in PH3. The aim of this study was to set up and validate a method for the simultaneous analysis of these metabolites in urine and to evaluate its use for preliminary identification of primary hyperoxaluria prior to definitive diagnosis by genetic testing. METHODS: Urine samples were derivitized by methoximation and silylation and extracted into organic solvent prior to analysis by gas chromatography mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Recovery of the analytes spiked into urine ranged from 91 to 103% and total analytical imprecision ranged from 3.0 to 13.6%. 4-Hydroxy-2-oxoglutarate was unstable in urine at room temperature, and preservation by acidification was required. Mean urinary glycolate, glycerate and 4-hydroxy-2-oxoglutarate or 2,4-dihydroxyglutarate (expressed as a ratio to creatinine) were significantly higher in patients with PH1, PH2 and PH3, respectively. Low 4-hydroxy-2-oxoglutarate was observed in some patients with PH3, probably due to the instability of this analyte, but all PH3 patients had elevated 2,4-dihydroxyglutarate. During five months of routine service, seven cases of PH were identified by this method and subsequently confirmed by gene sequencing including two with novel mutations in HOGA1. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that the method is useful in aiding the diagnosis of primary hyperoxaluria and can direct genetic testing.

The comparability of oxalate excretion and oxalate:creatinine ratio in the investigation of primary hyperoxaluria: review of data from a referral centre.

BACKGROUND: Urine oxalate measurement is an important investigation in the evaluation of renal stone disease. Primary hyperoxaluria (PH) is a rare inherited metabolic disease characterised by persistently elevated urine oxalate, but the diagnosis may be missed in adults until renal failure has developed. Urine oxalate results were reviewed to compare oxalate:creatinine ratio and oxalate excretion, and to estimate the potential numbers of undiagnosed PH. METHODS: Urine oxalate results from August 2011 to April 2013 were reviewed. Oxalate excretion and oxalate:creatinine ratio were evaluated for 24 h collections and ratio alone for spot urine samples. RESULTS: Oxalate:creatinine ratio and oxalate excretion were moderately correlated (R=0.63) in 24-h urine collections from patients aged 18 years and above. Sex-related differences were found requiring implementation of male and female reference ranges for oxalate:creatinine ratio. Of samples with both ratio and excretion above the reference range, 7% came from patients with confirmed PH. There were 24 patients with grossly elevated urine oxalate who had not been evaluated for PH. CONCLUSIONS: Oxalate:creatinine ratio and oxalate excretion were discordant in many patients, which is likely to be a result of intra-individual variation in creatinine output and imprecision in the collection itself. Some PH patients had urine oxalate within the reference range on occasion, and therefore it is not possible to exclude PH on the finding of a single normal result. A significant number of individuals had urine oxalate results well above the reference range who potentially have undiagnosed PH and are consequently at risk of renal failure.